Letting Agent Redress vs Landlord Ombudsman: Why Your Agent's Membership Doesn't Cover You

Two Separate Legal Duties

Your letting agent is legally required to belong to a government-approved redress scheme. That's been the law since 2014, under the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013. The two approved schemes for agents are The Property Ombudsman (TPO) and the Property Redress Scheme (PRS).

This requirement covers agent conduct — how the agency handles tenant enquiries, references, deposits, maintenance instructions, and management fees. If a tenant has a problem with how the agent behaved, they complain to TPO or PRS.

The PRS Landlord Ombudsman, provided for by Part 2, Chapter 2 of the Renters' Rights Act 2025, is a separate scheme. Once operational, it will handle complaints within its scope about a member landlord's conduct. Section 64 authorises regulations requiring landlords to join; that membership duty is not yet in force.

The two schemes operate under different legislation and handle complaints about different members' conduct. Once the landlord membership regulations take effect, an agent's TPO or Property Redress Scheme membership will not satisfy the landlord's separate membership duty.

What Agent Redress Actually Covers

Agent redress deals with complaints about the letting agency's own actions:

• Misleading property descriptions or marketing
• Mishandling of tenant references or applications
• Failures in rent collection or accounting
• Deposit handling errors
• Poor communication from agency staff
• Hidden fees or undisclosed charges

These are all things the agent did or failed to do in their capacity as a service provider. The complaints travel through the agent's redress scheme because the agent is the party at fault.

What the Landlord Ombudsman Covers

The Landlord Ombudsman handles complaints about the property owner's responsibilities:

• Maintenance delays and disrepair
• Failure to meet Decent Homes or Awaab's Law standards
• Unreasonable refusal of pet requests
• Unlawful rent increase procedures
• Inadequate response to damp, mould, or structural issues
• Poor internal complaint handling

Even when a letting agent manages day-to-day operations, a complaint scheme can consider the landlord's own conduct and responsibilities. An agent remains answerable under its own redress scheme for its conduct; if both contributed to a problem, each scheme may have a role.

Where a Dispute Involves Both

Section 70 of the Renters' Rights Act 2025 concerns guidance on cooperation between local housing authorities and landlord redress schemes. Schedule paragraph 8 of SI 2026/1033 requires the scheme to allow cooperation, including joint functions, with other landlord redress schemes and relevant complaint, enforcement, or regulatory bodies; an investigator must consider cooperation. This permits coordination with an agent's redress scheme, but does not require a joint investigation or consolidated determination in every case.

A practical example: a tenant reports a water leak. The agent delays forwarding the report to the landlord (agent fault). The landlord then takes three weeks to authorise the repair (landlord fault). Both parties face complaints through their respective schemes, with a joint investigation coordinating the findings.

The Landlord's Membership Exposure

The Landlord Ombudsman can order binding compensation up to £25,000 per determination. That award comes from the landlord's pocket, not the agent's.

If you fail to join the ombudsman scheme after the membership regulations take effect (expected in 2028), you may face:

• A civil penalty of up to £7,000 for a breach of the membership regulations
• A civil penalty of up to £40,000 or prosecution for specified continuing or repeat offences
• A separate PRS Database restriction on a court making a possession order while the landlord lacks an active database entry for the landlord and dwelling, except on Ground 7A or Ground 14; this is not an ombudsman-membership penalty
• A possible Rent Repayment Order of up to two years' rent for a qualifying continuing offence under section 67(1), subject to the statutory conditions

The membership duty and the separate PRS Database possession restriction concern the landlord. However, section 64 allows regulations to prohibit any person from marketing a dwelling unless the future landlord is a member, and section 66 allows a penalty for breaching those regulations. An agent who markets a property could therefore face a penalty if the membership regulations apply to that conduct. The agent also remains responsible for its own conduct under its redress scheme.

What Fully Managed Landlords Need to Do

Government implementation guidance says that landlords who use a letting or managing agent will still have to join when the membership duty takes effect. Whether you self-manage or use a full management service, the duty is on the landlord rather than the agent.

Start building your own records now. Keep dated copies of every instruction you give your agent, every repair authorisation, and every communication about property conditions. When a complaint arrives at the ombudsman, your defence depends on what you can prove, not what your agent claims happened.

The PRS Landlord Ombudsman guide walks through the exact boundary between agent and landlord liability, with a compliance checklist covering both managed and self-managed properties.

See more England guides →